Blog
Expert insights on estate planning, asset protection, tax law, tax preparation, tax planning, bookkeeping, accounting practices, wealth management, and legal matters for businesses and individuals.
SALT Cap at $40K: When the PTE Election Still Wins
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law in 2025, raised the federal SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,400 for 2026. That sounds like great news for S-corp owners and LLC members in high-tax states. And for many taxpayers, it is.
But here's the catch: if you own a pass-through business in California, New York, or New Jersey and your state tax bill already exceeds $40,400, the new cap still leaves tens of thousands of dollars in deductions on the table. A California S-corp owner earning $500,000 in pass-through income pays roughly $46,500 in state income tax. The SALT cap covers $40,400 of that. The remaining $6,100 or more disappears under the new law.
And for anyone with income above $500,000, the SALT cap phases out entirely, dropping back toward $10,000 once your MAGI hits $600,000.
That's where the pass-through entity (PTE) election still wins in 2026. This guide explains exactly who benefits, how to calculate the advantage, and what you need to do before the deadlines close.
15 min read
Lenny Whiting
Key Takeaways
The OBBBA raised the SALT cap to $40,400 in 2026, but the deduction phases out completely for taxpayers with MAGI above $600,000.
36 states plus New York City have enacted PTE tax elections, allowing entities to pay state income tax at the entity level and deduct it as a business expense, bypassing the SALT cap entirely.
A California S-corp owner with $500,000 in pass-through income faces roughly $46,500 in state tax. Only $40,400 is deductible under the new SALT cap; the PTE election makes the entire amount deductible as a business expense.
New York's PTET deadline for 2026 elections passed on March 15, 2026. California's initial payment is due June 15 of the taxable year. Missing these deadlines means losing the benefit entirely for the year.
What Is the SALT Deduction Cap and What Did the OBBBA Change in 2026?
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 capped the state and local tax (SALT) deduction at $10,000 per household, a limit that stayed flat for eight years. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act changed that in July 2025, raising the cap to $40,400 for tax year 2026 and indexing it upward by 1% annually through 2029 before it reverts to $10,000 in 2030.
The increase is real. For a married couple paying $35,000 in state property and income taxes, the new cap covers everything. That's a meaningful improvement over the TCJA's $10,000 ceiling.
But the cap comes with a phase-out that most news coverage has underemphasized. According to Kahn Litwin, the deduction begins phasing out when your MAGI exceeds $500,000 (for joint filers). For every dollar of MAGI above $500,000, the cap shrinks by 30 cents. By $600,000 MAGI, the allowed SALT deduction is effectively back near $10,000.
A taxpayer with $560,000 in MAGI, for example, loses $18,000 of the deduction through phase-out alone, leaving them with roughly $22,000 in allowed SALT deductions rather than $40,400.
The phase-out creates what some tax professionals are calling the "SALT torpedo": for taxpayers between $500,000 and $600,000 MAGI, each additional $100,000 in income can translate to an effective tax increase of $45,500 when you factor in both the income tax and the lost SALT deduction.
Citation Capsule: The OBBBA raised the federal SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,400 for tax year 2026, indexed for 1% annual inflation through 2029. However, the cap phases out at a rate of 30% for MAGI above $500,000, effectively reducing it back toward $10,000 for filers with MAGI above $600,000.
What Is the Pass-Through Entity (PTE) Tax Election?
Thirty-six states plus New York City have enacted pass-through entity tax regimes, allowing S-corporations, partnerships, and multi-member LLCs to pay state income tax at the entity level rather than pushing all of that liability to individual owners.
The mechanics matter. Here's how it works:
The entity elects into the state's PTET program.
The entity calculates state income tax on the qualifying pass-through income.
The entity pays that tax directly to the state.
The entity deducts that payment as a business expense on its federal return, before income is distributed to owners.
Each owner receives a state tax credit (dollar-for-dollar in most states) on their personal state return, so they don't pay state tax twice.
The critical result: the state tax payment becomes a federal business deduction at the entity level, not a personal itemized deduction subject to the SALT cap. It bypasses the $40,400 ceiling entirely.
RSM explains it this way: if a partnership pays $100,000 in state tax on behalf of a partner with $1 million in income, that partner still picks up $1 million on her resident state return but receives a $100,000 credit against her personal tax liability. Federally, the $100,000 was already deducted at the entity level, at a 37% rate that saves $37,000 in federal income tax.
<!-- [UNIQUE INSIGHT] -->
One important limitation: nonresident partners may not receive a credit in their home state for taxes paid by the entity in another state. If a New York LLC makes a PTET election and one partner lives in Florida (no income tax), that partner fully benefits. But if a partner lives in New Jersey, the NJ credit treatment for NY PTET payments requires careful review. Multi-state ownership structures need individual analysis, not a blanket election decision.
Citation Capsule: The pass-through entity tax election allows S-corporations and partnerships to pay state income tax at the entity level, deducting it as a business expense on their federal return. Owners receive a state tax credit to avoid double taxation. With a 37% federal rate, a $100,000 entity-level state tax deduction reduces federal liability by $37,000.
When Does the PTE Election Beat the New $40K SALT Cap?
The short answer: whenever your total state and local tax bill exceeds what the SALT cap allows you to deduct, and the PTE election can pick up the excess at the entity level.
For most S-corp and LLC owners in high-tax states, that threshold hits well below $500,000 in income.
Here's the breakeven analysis:
Scenario A: MAGI under $500,000. The full $40,400 SALT cap applies. If your total state tax bill is $38,000, the SALT cap covers all of it. The PTE election adds no benefit.
Scenario B: MAGI $500,000–$600,000. The phase-out reduces your allowed SALT deduction below $40,400. If your state tax is $48,000 and your MAGI is $550,000, the phase-out reduces your allowed deduction to roughly $31,000. The PTE election can deduct the remaining $17,000 or more at the entity level.
Scenario C: MAGI above $600,000. The SALT cap is effectively back near $10,000. Your PTE election can deduct the entire state tax bill as a business expense. This is where the election generates its largest savings.
So does the new $40K SALT cap eliminate the need for PTE elections? For taxpayers with moderate incomes and state tax bills under $40,400, yes. For business owners earning $300,000 or more in California, New York, or New Jersey, the answer is almost always no.
How Do You Calculate the PTE Election Benefit?
California's Franchise Tax Board confirms that the state's PTE elective tax rate is 9.3% of qualified net income, the rate that applies to most pass-through income before it reaches the top bracket surcharge layers. Here's a step-by-step example using a California S-corp owner:
Setup: Maria owns 100% of a California S-corporation. Her pass-through income for 2026 is $500,000. California's marginal income tax rate on this income reaches 9.3%. Her total California state income tax on this business income is approximately $46,500.
Step 1: Calculate SALT deduction without PTE election.
Maria's MAGI is $500,000, right at the phase-out threshold. Her SALT deduction is $40,400. She deducts $40,400 on her federal Schedule A and loses the remaining $6,100 in state taxes she paid.
Step 2: Apply PTE election.
Instead, Maria's S-corp elects into California's PTET for 2026. The corporation pays the $46,500 in state tax directly. That $46,500 is deducted as a business expense on the S-corp's federal return, before income flows to Maria's K-1.
Step 3: Compute the federal savings.
Maria's K-1 income is now effectively reduced by $46,500 on the federal return. At her 37% marginal rate, this saves her $17,205 in federal income taxes. She also receives a California state tax credit that offsets her personal CA tax liability dollar-for-dollar, so she isn't taxed twice on the same income.
Step 4: Compare.
Without PTE election: Maria deducts $40,400 SALT, saving $14,948 in federal tax ($40,400 x 37%).
With PTE election: Maria deducts the full $46,500, saving $17,205 in federal tax.
Net gain from the PTE election: $2,257 for this specific example. But as income rises above $500,000, the SALT cap phases out rapidly. At $600,000 income in California, the cap is effectively $10,000, and the PTE election can deduct over $55,000 in state tax. The federal savings jump to $20,350, compared to just $3,700 under the capped SALT deduction.
<!-- [PERSONAL EXPERIENCE] -->
In practice, most CPA firms working with high-earning business owners in California, New York, and New Jersey are treating the PTE election as the default position for 2026, not a strategy to consider. The analysis becomes a question of confirming benefits, not debating them. The exception is entities with significant nonresident partners who can't use the state credit in their home state.
Citation Capsule: California's PTE elective tax rate is 9.3% of qualified net income, applied at the entity level. Senate Bill 132 extended the program through 2030. For a California S-corp owner with $500,000 in pass-through income, the PTE election deducts approximately $46,500 in state tax as a business expense at the 37% federal rate, generating up to $17,205 in federal tax savings.
For a detailed comparison of S-corp and LLC structures and which entity type maximizes the PTE benefit, see the S-corp vs LLC tax comparison.
Which States Offer the Best PTE Election Benefits?
The benefit of a PTE election scales directly with the state tax rate. Higher state rates mean larger entity-level deductions and bigger federal tax savings. RSM US confirms that 37 jurisdictions have enacted PTET regimes, so most pass-through owners in income-tax states have access to this planning.
Here's how three top states compare for an owner with $500,000 in pass-through income:
State | PTE Rate | Entity-Level State Tax | Federal Deduction Saved (37%) |
|---|---|---|---|
California | 9.3% | $46,500 | $17,205 |
New York | 6.85%–10.9% | $36,000–$54,500 | $13,320–$20,165 |
New Jersey (BAIT) | 5.675%–10.9% | $28,375 (at 5.675%) | $10,499 |
Figures assume $500,000 in pass-through income; New York's range reflects graduated rates and NYC's additional PTET layer. Sources: RSM US; NJ Division of Taxation (2026).
California (9.3% PTE rate):
Entity-level state tax: approximately $46,500.
Federal deduction at 37%: saves $17,205 in federal income tax.
Without PTE election (at $500K MAGI, full $40,400 cap): $14,948 saved.
Additional savings from PTE election: $2,257 at this income level, growing significantly above $500K.
New York (PTET up to 10.9%):
New York's PTET rate matches the top personal income tax rate of 10.9% for income above $25 million, with graduated rates below. For most business owners, the effective PTET rate ranges from 6.85% to 10.9%. On $500,000 of NY-sourced income, state tax is roughly $36,000 to $54,500 depending on the owner's total income.
New York City residents face an additional city PTET layer. NYC has its own PTET at rates up to 3.876%, meaning a NYC-based partnership owner can deduct both NY state and NYC PTET at the entity level.
New Jersey (BAIT at rates up to 10.9%):
New Jersey calls its program the Business Alternative Income Tax (BAIT). [The NJ Division of Taxation](https://www.nj.gov/treasury/taxation/baitpte/index.shtml) confirms the top rate of 10.9% applies to distributive proceeds above $1 million. Below $1 million, rates start at 5.675%. For an NJ business owner with $500,000 in pass-through income, the BAIT generates a federal deduction of approximately $28,375 at the 5.675% rate, saving $10,499 in federal income taxes.
Which states should you prioritize? California's 13.3% top marginal rate produces the largest potential PTE deduction for high earners, but the PTE rate is set at 9.3% to reflect the lower bracket most business income falls into. New York's combination of state and city PTET can produce the largest combined deduction for high-income NYC-based owners.
What Are the Deadlines and Steps to Make the PTE Election?
CBIZ reports that 36 states and NYC maintain PTE tax elections, and each state has its own window. Missing a deadline isn't a small procedural issue. In some states, a missed deadline means no election for the entire tax year, with no exceptions.
Here are the key deadlines and steps for major states in 2026:
New York (deadline: March 15):
The 2026 NYS PTET election deadline was March 15, 2026. Elections are made online through the NY Tax Department portal. The election is annual, irrevocable once made, and has no extension. If you missed March 15, 2026, you cannot elect for 2026. Start planning for March 15, 2027 now.
California (initial payment: June 15):
California's PTE election is made on a timely-filed return (including extensions), but entities must make an initial payment by June 15 of the taxable year. [Under SB 132](https://evolutiontaxlegal.com/california-pte-tax-changes-sb-132/), if the June 15 payment is missed or underpaid, the election remains valid but each owner must reduce their PTE credit by 12.5% of their pro rata share of the underpaid amount. So missing June 15 isn't fatal, but it's expensive.
New Jersey (deadline: 15th day of 3rd month after year-end):
NJ requires a separate electronic Form PTE-100 filing by the 15th day of the third month following the close of the tax year. For calendar-year entities, that's March 15 of the following year.
Illinois:
Illinois integrates the PTET election into the timely-filed tax return. No separate election filing is required, but you must pay estimated PTET throughout the year.
The general process, step by step:
1. Confirm all partners or shareholders are "qualified taxpayers" under your state's rules. Corporations and partnerships typically cannot be PTET owners in most states.
2. Estimate the entity's qualifying income and state tax rate to project the deduction.
3. Confirm that all nonresident owners can receive a usable credit in their resident states.
4. Make the election by the deadline (online portal for NY; return-based for CA and IL).
5. Make required estimated payments throughout the year.
6. File the entity-level PTET return and distribute the credit information to owners on their K-1s.
Citation Capsule: The pass-through entity tax election must be made separately in most states, with deadlines ranging from March 15 (New York) to June 15 (California initial payment) to the 15th day of the third month following year-end (New Jersey). Missing these deadlines eliminates the election for the entire tax year in most jurisdictions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the OBBBA's $40K SALT cap make the PTE election unnecessary?
Not for most S-corp and LLC owners in high-tax states. The $40,400 cap applies only to personal itemized deductions and phases out completely for MAGI above $600,000. Business owners in California, New York, and New Jersey routinely owe more in state tax than $40,400 on incomes of $300,000 and above, making the PTE election the more complete deduction.
Who qualifies to make the PTE election?
Most states limit the PTE election to entities taxed as S-corporations, partnerships, or multi-member LLCs. The owners, called qualified taxpayers, are generally individuals, trusts, and estates. C-corporations typically cannot participate. In most states, all members must consent or a supermajority must vote to elect, and nonresident owners should confirm their home state will allow a credit for the entity-level tax paid.
Can you make the PTE election if some partners are nonresidents?
You can, but nonresident partners may not receive a credit in their resident state for the PTET paid by the entity. RSM US notes this is one of the biggest risks of blanket elections. If a partner's resident state doesn't recognize the credit, they'll pay state tax at the entity level and again personally, with no offset. Run the analysis for each nonresident owner before electing.
What happens to the PTE election after 2030?
The OBBBA's $40,400 SALT cap reverts to $10,000 in 2030 unless Congress acts again. California's PTET program was extended through 2030 by SB 132. The return of the $10,000 cap would dramatically increase the value of PTE elections for any owner with state taxes above $10,000. Most CPA firms are already building 2030 planning scenarios that assume the SALT cap reverts and the PTE election becomes even more critical.
How does the PTE election interact with estimated tax payments?
The entity makes estimated PTET payments throughout the year, typically on the same quarterly schedule as personal estimated taxes (April 15, June 15, September 15, January 15 in most states). These payments are made from business accounts and reduce the entity's cash flow during the year. Owners should adjust their personal estimated tax payments downward to avoid overpaying, since they'll receive a credit on their personal return for taxes paid at the entity level.
Conclusion
The OBBBA's increase to a $40,400 SALT cap helps many middle-income taxpayers who were hurt by the original $10,000 ceiling. But for S-corp owners, LLC members, and partners in California, New York, and New Jersey earning $300,000 or more, the new cap still doesn't cover the full state tax bill. And for anyone above $600,000 in MAGI, the phase-out sends them right back to a cap near $10,000.
The pass-through entity tax election solves this. By moving the state tax deduction from the personal return to the entity return, it removes the SALT cap from the equation entirely. The federal savings are real, calculable, and in most cases worth more than the cost and complexity of making the election.
The deadlines are the limiting factor. New York's window has already closed for 2026. California's June 15 initial payment deadline is near. If you haven't yet made this election for 2026 in every applicable state, this is the conversation to have with your CPA today, not in October.
For a broader look at how your entity structure affects your total tax bill, see the business entity tax planning guide.
About Lenny Whiting
CPA Attorney Owner
Related Articles
Advanced Tax Strategies
Cash Balance Plans: An Advanced Tax Strategy for Business Owners Who've Maxed Out Their 401(k)
A cash balance plan can let a 55-year-old business owner deduct $253,300 a year, far past 401(k) limits. See how it works, what it costs, and who qualifies.
Lenny Whiting
Estate PlanningAdvanced Tax Strategies
Advanced Tax Planning for Family Estates and Complex Trusts
Complex trusts hit the top 37% tax bracket at $15,650 of income. See how SLATs, GRATs, and GST planning protect family estates — from a CPA/attorney firm.
Lenny Whiting
Advanced Tax Strategies
Advanced Tax Strategies for Selling a Business
I break down how QSBS, a deferred sales trust and smart deal structure work together to cut the tax bill when you sell your business.
Lenny Whiting